Office of Appeals Begins Pilot Program on Mediation (IR-2025-100) The IRS Independent Office of Appeals has launched a two-year pilot program to make Post Appeals Mediation (PAM) more attractive to taxpayers. Under the new PAM pilot, cases will be reassigned to an A...
NJ - Casino licensee CBT guidance issued New Jersey has summarized casino licensee obligations under the Corporation Business Tax (CBT), compiled existing guidance, and provided references to relevant publications and rules. The guidance cov...
NY - 2026 withholding tables released Updated New York State, New York City, and Yonkers publications containing withholding tables and methods have been released for 2026.The revised state schedules reflect certain rate reductions enacte...
PA - Philadelphia reminds taxpayers of changes Philadelphia reminds taxpayers about upcoming changes to its:business income and receipts tax (BIRT);property tax;use & occupancy tax; andwage, school income, and earnings tax.Exemption Eliminatio...
In light of a recent Tax Court ruling, we are currently reviewing the files of our clients who are S corporation officers. It is possible that the decisions of the Tax Court may affect your corporation in the future.
In light of a recent Tax Court ruling, we are currently reviewing the files of our clients who are S corporation officers. It is possible that the decisions of the Tax Court may affect your corporation in the future. In their ruling, the Tax Court held that the sole shareholder and president of an S corporation performed duties similar to those an employee would perform and, therefore, had the status of employee for employment tax purposes. The IRS held the taxpayer liable for FICA and FUTA taxes that it failed to pay because of misclassification of the officer as an independent contractor.
Shareholder distributions versus salary payments may raise similar issues. For federal employment tax purposes, a corporate officer is considered an employee, unless the officer performs no services or only minor services to the corporation and neither receives nor is entitled to payment for these services. The form of payment is immaterial, the only relevant factor being whether the payments were actually received as compensation for employment. Distributions to shareholders may be reclassified as wages subject to FICA and FUTA taxes where compensation appears to be insufficient. Determining the range of reasonableness of compensation for your business where shareholder compensation should fall within that range depends upon many variables. With proper planning, we hope that you and your business can avoid similar scrutiny.
Please contact our office to review and discuss your corporation’s compensation structure.
The IRS has released the annual inflation adjustments for 2026 for the income tax rate tables, plus more than 60 other tax provisions. The IRS makes these cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) each year to reflect inflation.
The IRS has released the annual inflation adjustments for 2026 for the income tax rate tables, plus more than 60 other tax provisions. The IRS makes these cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) each year to reflect inflation.
2026 Income Tax Brackets
For 2026, the highest income tax bracket of 37 percent applies when taxable income hits:
$768,700 for married individuals filing jointly and surviving spouses,
$640,600 for single individuals and heads of households,
$384,350 for married individuals filing separately, and
$16,000 for estates and trusts.
2026 Standard Deduction
The standard deduction for 2026 is:
$32,200 for married individuals filing jointly and surviving spouses,
$24,150 for heads of households, and
$16,100 for single individuals and married individuals filing separately.
The standard deduction for a dependent is limited to the greater of:
$1,350 or
the sum of $450, plus the dependent’s earned income.
Individuals who are blind or at least 65 years old get an additional standard deduction of:
$1,650 for married taxpayers and surviving spouses, or
$2,050 for other taxpayers.
Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) Exemption for 2026
The AMT exemption for 2026 is:
$140,200 for married individuals filing jointly and surviving spouses,
$90,100 for single individuals and heads of households,
$70,100 for married individuals filing separately, and
$31,400 for estates and trusts.
The exemption amounts phase out in 2026 when AMTI exceeds:
$1,000,000 for married individuals filing jointly and surviving spouses,
$500,000 for single individuals, heads of households, and married individuals filing separately, and
For tax years beginning in 2026, taxpayers can expense up to $2,560,000 in section 179 property. However, this dollar limit is reduced when the cost of section 179 property placed in service during the year exceeds $4,090,000.
Estate and Gift Tax Adjustments for 2026
The following inflation adjustments apply to federal estate and gift taxes in 2026:
the gift tax exclusion is $19,000 per donee, or $194,000 for gifts to spouses who are not U.S. citizens;
the federal estate tax exclusion is $15,000,000; and
the maximum reduction for real property under the special valuation method is $1,460,000.
2026 Inflation Adjustments for Other Tax Items
The maximum foreign earned income exclusion amount in 2026 is $132,900.
The IRS also provided inflation-adjusted amounts for the:
adoption credit,
earned income credit,
excludable interest on U.S. savings bonds used for education,
various penalties, and
many other provisions.
Effective Date of 2026 Adjustments
These inflation adjustments generally apply to tax years beginning in 2026, so they affect most returns that will be filed in 2027. However, some specified figures apply to transactions or events in calendar year 2026.
The IRS has released the 2025-2026 special per diem rates. Taxpayers use the per diem rates to substantiate certain expenses incurred while traveling away from home. These special per diem rates include:
The IRS has released the 2025-2026 special per diem rates. Taxpayers use the per diem rates to substantiate certain expenses incurred while traveling away from home. These special per diem rates include:
the special transportation industry meal and incidental expenses (M&IE) rates,
the rate for the incidental expenses only deduction,
and the rates and list of high-cost localities for purposes of the high-low substantiation method.
Transportation Industry Special Per Diem Rates
The special M&IE rates for taxpayers in the transportation industry are:
$80 for any locality of travel in the continental United States (CONUS), and
$86 for any locality of travel outside the continental United States (OCONUS).
Incidental Expenses Only Rate
The rate is $5 per day for any CONUS or OCONUS travel for the incidental expenses only deduction.
High-Low Substantiation Method
For purposes of the high-low substantiation method, the 2025-2026 special per diem rates are:
$319 for travel to any high-cost locality, and
$225 for travel to any other locality within CONUS.
The amount treated as paid for meals is:
$86 for travel to any high-cost locality, and
$74 for travel to any other locality within CONUS
Instead of the meal and incidental expenses only substantiation method, taxpayers may use:
$86 for travel to any high-cost locality, and
$74 for travel to any other locality within CONUS.
Taxpayers using the high-low method must comply withRev. Proc. 2019-48, I.R.B. 2019-51, 1392. That procedure provides the rules for using a per diem rate to substantiate the amount of ordinary and necessary business expenses paid or incurred while traveling away from home.
The IRS has issued transitional guidance for reporting certain interest payments received on specified passenger vehicle loans made in the course of a trade or business during calendar year 2025. The guidance applies to reporting obligations under new Code Sec. 6050AA, enacted as part of the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act (P.L. 119-21).
The IRS has issued transitional guidance for reporting certain interest payments received on specified passenger vehicle loans made in the course of a trade or business during calendar year 2025. The guidance applies to reporting obligations under newCode Sec. 6050AA, enacted as part of the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act (P.L. 119-21).
UnderCode Sec. 163(h)(4), as amended,"qualified passenger vehicle loan interest"is deductible by an individual for tax years beginning in 2025 through 2028.Code Sec. 6050AArequires any person engaged in a trade or business who receives $600 or more in such interest from an individual in a calendar year to file an information return with the IRS and statements to the borrowers. The information return must include the borrower’s identifying information, the amount of interest paid, loan details, and vehicle information.
Recognizing that lenders may need additional time to update their systems and that the Service must design new reporting forms, the Treasury Department and the IRS have granted temporary relief. For calendar year 2025 only, recipients may satisfy their reporting obligations by providing a statement to each borrower by January 31, 2026, indicating the total amount of interest received in calendar year 2025 on a specified passenger vehicle loan. This information may be delivered electronically, through online portals, or via annual or monthly statements.
No penalties underCode Sec. 6721or6722will be imposed for 2025 if recipients comply with this transitional reporting procedure. The notice is effective for interest received during calendar year 2025. The IRS estimates that approximately 35,800 respondents will issue about 8 million responses annually, with an average burden of 0.25 hours per response.
The IRS issued updates to frequently asked questions (FAQs) about Form 1099-K, Payment Card and Third-Party Network Transactions (Code Sec. 6050W). The updates reflect changes made under the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), which reinstated the prior reporting threshold for third-party settlement organizations (TPSOs) and provided clarifications on filing requirements, taxpayer responsibilities, and penalty relief provisions. The updates supersede those issued in FS-2024-03. More information is available here.
The IRS issued updates to frequently asked questions (FAQs) about Form 1099-K, Payment Card and Third-Party Network Transactions (Code Sec. 6050W). The updates reflect changes made under the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), which reinstated the prior reporting threshold for third-party settlement organizations (TPSOs) and provided clarifications on filing requirements, taxpayer responsibilities, and penalty relief provisions. The updates supersede those issued in FS-2024-03. More information is availablehere.
Form 1099-K Reporting Threshold
Under the OBBB, the reporting threshold for TPSOs has been restored to the pre-ARPA level, requiring a Form 1099-K to be issued only when the gross amount of payments exceeds $20,000 and the number of transactions exceeds 200. The lower $600 threshold established by the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) no longer applies. The IRS noted that while the federal threshold has increased, some states may impose lower thresholds, and TPSOs must comply with those state-level reporting requirements.
Taxpayer Guidance
The FAQs explain that a Form 1099-K reports payments received through payment cards (credit, debit, or stored-value cards) or payment apps and online marketplaces used for selling goods or providing services. All income remains taxable unless excluded by law, even if not reported on a Form 1099-K.
If a Form 1099-K is incorrect or issued in error, taxpayers should contact the filer listed on the form to request a correction. If a corrected form cannot be obtained in time, taxpayers may adjust the reporting on Schedule 1 (Form 1040) by offsetting the erroneous amount when filing their return.
New Clarifications and Examples
The updated FAQs include expanded examples to help taxpayers properly determine income and filing obligations:
Sales of personal items– How to determine taxable gain or nondeductible loss on items sold through online platforms?
Crowdfunding proceeds– When contributions are taxable income versus nontaxable gifts.
Backup withholding– How failure to provide a valid taxpayer identification number (TIN) can result in withholding underCode Sec. 3406?
Multiple Forms 1099-K– How to report combined or duplicate forms properly using Schedule 1 (Form 1040)?
Third-Party Filer Responsibilities
The FAQs reaffirm that merchant acquiring entities and TPSOs are responsible for preparing, filing, and furnishing Form 1099-K statements. There is no de minimis exception for payment-card transactions. Entities that submit payment instructions remain subject to penalties underCode Sec. 6721and6722for failing to file or furnish correct information returns. TPSOs are not required to include Merchant Category Codes (MCCs), while merchant acquiring entities must do so where applicable.
Ticket Sales and Executive Order 14254
The updated FAQs also address Executive Order 14254, Combating Unfair Practices in the Live Entertainment Market, issued in March 2025. The IRS clarified that income from ticket sales and resales is includible in gross income and subject to reporting. Payment settlement entities facilitating these sales must issue Form 1099-K when federal thresholds are met, and non-PSE payors may be required to issue Form 1099-MISC or Form 1099-NEC for payments of $2,000 or more made after December 31, 2025.
Reliance and Penalty Relief
Although the FAQs are not published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (IRB) and cannot be used as legal precedent, the IRS confirmed that taxpayers who reasonably and in good faith rely on them will not be subject to penalties that allow for a reasonable-cause standard, including negligence or accuracy-related penalties, if such reliance results in an underpayment of tax.
For 2026, the Social Security wage cap will be $184,500, and Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits will increase by 2.8 percent. These changes reflect cost-of-living adjustments to account for inflation.
For 2026, the Social Security wage cap will be $184,500, and Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits will increase by 2.8 percent. These changes reflect cost-of-living adjustments to account for inflation.
Wage Cap for Social Security Tax
The Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) tax on wages is 7.65 percent each for the employee and the employer. FICA tax has two components:
a 6.2 percent social security tax, also known as old age, survivors, and disability insurance (OASDI); and
a 1.45 percent Medicare tax, also known as hospital insurance (HI).
For self-employed workers, the Self-Employment tax is 15.3 percent, consisting of:
a 12.4 percent OASDI tax; and
a 2.9 percent HI tax.
OASDI tax applies only up to a wage base, which includes most wages and self-employment income up to the annual wage cap.
For 2026, the wage base is $184,500. Thus, OASDI tax applies only to the taxpayer’s first $184,500 in wages or net earnings from self-employment. Taxpayers do not pay any OASDI tax on earnings that exceed $184,500.
There is no wage cap for HI tax.
Maximum Social Security Tax for 2026
For workers who earn $184,500 or more in 2026:
an employee will pay a total of $11,439 in social security tax ($184,500 x 6.2 percent);
the employer will pay the same amount; and
a self-employed worker will pay a total of $22,878 in social security tax ($184,500 x 12.4 percent).
Additional Medicare Tax
Higher-income workers may have to pay an Additional Medicare tax of 0.9 percent. This tax applies to wages and self-employment income that exceed:
$250,000 for married taxpayers who file a joint return;
$125,000 for married taxpayers who file separate returns; and
$200,000 for other taxpayers.
The annual wage cap does not affect the Additional Medicare tax.
Benefit Increase for 2026
Finally, a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) will increase social security and SSI benefits for 2026 by 2.8 percent. The COLA is intended to ensure that inflation does not erode the purchasing power of these benefits.
The IRS issued frequently asked questions (FAQs) addressing the limitation on Employee Retention Credit (ERC) claims for the third and fourth quarters of 2021 under the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). The FAQs clarify when such claims are disallowed and how the IRS will handle related filings.
The IRS issued frequently asked questions (FAQs) addressing the limitation on Employee Retention Credit (ERC) claims for the third and fourth quarters of 2021 under the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). The FAQs clarify when such claims are disallowed and how the IRS will handle related filings.
Limitation on Late Claims
ERC claims filed after January 31, 2024, for the third and fourth quarters of 2021 will not be allowed or refunded after July 4, 2025, under section 70605(d) of the OBBBA.
Previously Refunded Claims
Claims filed after January 31, 2024, that were refunded or credited before July 4, 2025, are not affected by this limitation. Other IRS compliance reviews, however, may still apply.
Withdrawn Claims
An amended return withdrawing a previously claimed ERC after January 31, 2024, is not subject to section 70605(d). The IRS will process such amended returns.
Filing Date
An ERC claim is considered filed on or before January 31, 2024, if the return was postmarked or electronically submitted by that date.
Processing of Other Items
If an ERC claim is disallowed under section 70605(d), the IRS may still process other items on the same return.
Appeals Rights
Taxpayers whose ERC claims are disallowed will receive Letter 105-C (Claim Disallowed) and may appeal to the IRS Independent Office of Appeals if they believe the claim was timely filed.
The IRS identified drought-stricken areas where tax relief is available to taxpayers that sold or exchanged livestock because of drought. The relief extends the deadlines for taxpayers to replace the livestock and avoid reporting gain on the sales. These extensions apply until the drought-stricken area has a drought-free year.
The IRS identified drought-stricken areas where tax relief is available to taxpayers that sold or exchanged livestock because of drought. The relief extends the deadlines for taxpayers to replace the livestock and avoid reporting gain on the sales. These extensions apply until the drought-stricken area has a drought-free year.
When Sales of Livestock are Involuntary Conversions
Sales of livestock due to drought are involuntary conversions of property. Taxpayers can postpone gain on involuntary conversions if they buy qualified replacement property during the replacement period. Qualified replacement property must be similar or related in service or use to the converted property.
Usually, the replacement period ends two years after the tax year in which the involuntary conversion occurs. However, a longer replacement period applies in several situations, such as when sales occur in a drought-stricken area.
Livestock Sold Because of Weather
Taxpayers have four years to replace livestock they sold or exchanged solely because of drought, flood, or other weather condition. Three conditions apply.
First, the livestock cannot be raised for slaughter, held for sporting purposes or be poultry.
Second, the taxpayer must have held the converted livestock for:
draft,
dairy, or
breeding purposes.
Third, the weather condition must make the area eligible for federal assistance.
Persistent Drought
The IRS extends the four-year replacement period when a taxpayer sells or exchanges livestock due to persistent drought. The extension continues until the taxpayer’s region experiences a drought-free year.
The first drought-free year is the first 12-month period that:
ends on August 31 in or after the last year of the four-year replacement period, and
does not include any weekly period of drought.
What Areas are Suffering from Drought
The National Drought Mitigation Center produces weekly Drought Monitor maps that report drought-stricken areas. Taxpayers can view these maps at
However, the IRS also provided a list of areas where the year ending on August 31, 2025, was not a drought-free year. The replacement period in these areas will continue until the area has a drought-free year.
The IRS and Treasury have issued final regulations setting forth recordkeeping and reporting requirements for the average income test for purposes of the low-income housing credit. The regulations adopt the proposed and temporary regulations issued in 2022 with only minor, non-substantive changes.
The IRS and Treasury have issued final regulations setting forth recordkeeping and reporting requirements for the average income test for purposes of the low-income housing credit. The regulations adopt the proposed and temporary regulations issued in 2022 with only minor, non-substantive changes.
Low-Income Housing Credit
An owner of a newly constructed or substantially rehabilitated qualified low-income building in a qualified low-income housing project may be eligible for the low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC) underCode Sec. 42. A project qualifies as a low-income housing project it satisfies certain set-aside tests or alternatively an average income test.
Under the average income test, at least 40 percent (25 percent in New York City) of a qualified group of residential units must be both rent-restricted and occupied by low-income individuals. Also, the average of the imputed income limitations must not exceed 60 percent of the area median gross income (AMGI).
Recording Keeping and Reporting Requirements
The regulations provide procedures for a taxpayer to identify a qualified group of residential units that satisfy the average income test. This includes recording the identification in the taxpayer’s books and records, including a change in a unit’s imputed income limit. The taxpayer also must communicate the annual identification to the applicable housing agency.
The final regulations clarify the submission of a corrected qualified group when the taxpayer or housing agency realizes that a previously submitted group fails to be a qualified group. The housing agency is also allowed the discretion to permit a taxpayer to submit one or two lists qualified groups of low-income units to demonstrate compliance with the minimum set-aside test and the applicable fractions for the building.
As an individual or business, it is your responsibility to be aware of and to meet your tax filing/reporting deadlines. This calendar summarizes important federal tax reporting and filing data for individuals, businesses and other taxpayers for the month of June 2014.
As an individual or business, it is your responsibility to be aware of and to meet your tax filing/reporting deadlines. This calendar summarizes important federal tax reporting and filing data for individuals, businesses and other taxpayers for the month of June 2014.
June 4 Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates May 28-30.
June 6 Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates May 31-June 3.
June 10 Employees who work for tips. Employees who received $20 or more in tips during May must report them to their employer using Form 4070.
June 11 Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates June 4-6.
June 13 Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates June 7-10.
June 16 Individuals. Individuals, partnerships, passthrough entities and corporations make the second installment of 2014 estimated quarterly tax payments.
Individuals. U.S. citizens or resident aliens living and working (or on military duty) outside the United States and Puerto Rico must file Form 1040 and pay any tax, interest, and penalties due.
June 18 Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates June 11-13.
June 20 Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates June 14-17.
June 25 Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates June 18-20.
June 27 Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates June 21-24.
June 30 Foreign Assets. FinCEN Form 114, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) (formerly Form TD F 90-22.1) due. FinCEN Notice 2013-1 extended the due date for filing FBARs by certain individuals with signature authority over, but no financial interest in, foreign financial accounts of their employer or a closely related entity, to June 30, 2015.
July 2 Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates June 25-27.
July 7 Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates June 28-30.
Retired employees often start taking benefits by age 65 and, under the minimum distribution rules, must begin taking distributions from their retirement plans when they reach age 70 ½. According to Treasury, a 65-year old female has an even chance of living past age 86, while a 65-year old male has an even chance of living past age 84. The government has become concerned that taxpayers who normally retire at age 65 or even age 70 will outlive their retirement benefits.
Retired employees often start taking benefits by age 65 and, under the minimum distribution rules, must begin taking distributions from their retirement plans when they reach age 70 ½. According to Treasury, a 65-year old female has an even chance of living past age 86, while a 65-year old male has an even chance of living past age 84. The government has become concerned that taxpayers who normally retire at age 65 or even age 70 will outlive their retirement benefits.
The government has found that most employees want at least a partial lump sum payment at retirement, so that some cash is currently available for living expenses. However, under current rules, most employer plans do not offer a partial lump sum coupled with a partial annuity. Employees often are faced with an “all or nothing” decision, where they would have to take their entire retirement benefit either as a lump sum payment when they retire, or as an annuity that does not make available any immediate lump-sum cash cushion. For retirees who live longer, it becomes difficult to stretch their lump sum benefits.
Longevity solution
To address this dilemma, the government is proposing new retirement plan rules to allow plans to make available a partial lump sum payment while allowing participants to take an annuity with the other portion of their benefits. Furthermore, to address the problem of employees outliving their benefits, the government would also encourage plans to offer “longevity” annuities. These annuities would not begin paying benefits until ages 80 or 85. They would provide you a larger annual payment for the same funds than would an annuity starting at age 70 ½. Of course, one reason for the better buy-in price is that you or your heirs would receive nothing if you die before the age 80 or 85 starting date. But many experts believe that it is worth the cost to have the security of knowing that this will help prevent you from “outliving your money.”
To streamline the calculation of partial annuities, the government would allow employees receiving lump-sum payouts from their 401(k) plans to transfer assets into the employer’s existing defined benefit (DB) plan and to purchase an annuity through the DB plan. This would give employees access to the DB plans low-cost annuity purchase rates.
According to the government, the required minimum distribution (RMD) rules are a deterrent to longevity annuities. Because of the minimum distribution rules, plan benefits that could otherwise be deferred until ages 80 or 85 have to start being distributed to a retired employee at age 70 ½. These rules can affect distributions from 401(k) plans, 403(b) tax-sheltered annuities, individual retirement accounts under Code Sec. 408, and eligible governmental deferred compensation plans under Code Sec. 457.
Tentative limitations
The IRS proposes to modify the RMD rules to allow a portion of a participant’s retirement account to be set aside to fund the purchase of a deferred annuity. Participants would be able to exclude the value of this qualified longevity annuity contract (QLAC) from the account balance used to calculate RMDs. Under this approach, up to 25 percent of the account balance could be excluded. The amount is limited to 25 percent to deter the use of longevity annuities as an estate planning device to pass on assets to descendants.
Coming soon
Many of these changes are in proposed regulations and would not take effect until the government issues final regulations. The changes would apply to distributions with annuity starting dates in plan years beginning after final regulations are published, which could be before the end of 2012. Our office will continue to monitor the progress of this important development.
A consequence of the economic downturn for many investors has been significant losses on their investments in retirement accounts, including traditional and Roth individual retirement accounts (IRAs). This article discusses when and how taxpayers can deduct losses suffered in Roth IRAs and traditional IRAs ...and when no deduction will be allowed.
A consequence of the economic downturn for many investors has been significant losses on their investments in retirement accounts, including traditional and Roth individual retirement accounts (IRAs). This article discusses when and how taxpayers can deduct losses suffered in Roth IRAs and traditional IRAs ...and when no deduction will be allowed.
Traditional IRAs
Losses on investments held in a traditional IRA, funded only by contributions that you deducted when you made them, are never deductible. Even when you cash out the IRA after retirement, losses cannot be deducted. The theory behind this rule is that you already received a tax benefit in your deduction for making contributions and any loss lowers the amount of taxable income you must realize when you make retirement withdrawals. The technical explanation is that you are presumed to have a zero basis in your account.
On the other hand, if you make nondeductible traditional IRA contributions, and liquidate all of the investments in your traditional IRA, a loss can be recognized if the amounts distributed are less than the remaining unrecovered basis in the traditional IRA. You claim a loss in a traditional IRA on Schedule A, Form 1040, as a miscellaneous itemized deduction subject to the two percent AGI floor.
Example. During 2008, you made $2,000 in nondeductible contributions to a traditional IRA. Your basis in the IRA at the end of 2008 is $2,000. During 2008, the IRA earned $400 in dividend income and you withdrew $600 from the account. As a result, at the end of 2008 the value of your IRA was $1,800 ($2,000 contributed plus $400 dividends minus $600 withdrawal). You compute and report the taxable portion of your $600 withdrawal and your remaining basis on Form 8606, Nondeductible IRA.
In 2009, the year you retired, your IRA lost $500 in value. At the end of 2009, your IRA balance was $1,300 ($1,800 balance at the end of 2008 minus the $500 loss). Your remaining basis at that time in your IRA is $1,500 ($2,000 nondeductible contributions minus the $500 basis in the prior withdrawal). You withdraw the $1,300 balance remaining in the IRA. You can claim a loss of $200 (your $1,500 basis minus the $1,300 withdrawn) on Form 1040, Schedule A. The allowable loss is further subject to the two percent adjusted gross income (AGI) floor on miscellaneous itemized deductions.
If you made significant nondeductible contributions to an IRA over the last few years, and may be considering withdrawing the entire balance in all of your traditional IRAs before the end of the year in order to recognize a loss, keep in mind doing so will mean losing the opportunity to defer gain if the value of your investments in the accounts increases. Those withdrawn amounts cannot be recontributed at a later date.
Roth IRA losses
When you experience losses on Roth IRA investments, you can only recognize the loss for income tax purposes, if and when all the amounts in the Roth IRA accounts have been distributed and the total distributions are less than your basis (e.g. regular and conversion contributions).
To report a loss in a Roth IRA, all the investments held in your Roth IRA (but not traditional IRAs) must be liquidated. Moreover, the loss is an ordinary loss for income tax purposes, not a capital loss, and can only be claimed as a miscellaneous itemized deduction subject to the two percent of AGI floor that applies to miscellaneous itemized deductions on Form 1040, Schedule A.
Since all Roth IRAs must be completely liquidated to generate a loss deduction, it generally provides only a small comfort to investments gone sour. Closing all your Roth IRAs generally forgoes future appreciation on that amount.
If you are considering liquidating your Roth IRA or traditional IRA to take the loss, please contact our office and we can discuss the tax and financial consequences before finalizing any plans.
In order to be tax deductible, compensation must be a reasonable payment for services. Smaller companies, whose employees frequently hold significant ownership interests, are particularly vulnerable to IRS attack on their compensation deductions.
In order to be tax deductible, compensation must be a reasonable payment for services. Smaller companies, whose employees frequently hold significant ownership interests, are particularly vulnerable to IRS attack on their compensation deductions.
Reasonable compensation is generally defined as the amount that would ordinarily be paid for like services by like enterprises under like circumstances. This broad definition is supplemented, for purposes of determining whether compensation is deductible as an ordinary and necessary expense, by a number of more specific factors expressed in varying forms by the IRS, the Tax Court and the Circuit Courts of Appeal, and generally relating to the type and extent of services provided, the financial concerns of the company, and the nature of the relationship between the employee and the employer.
Why IRS Is Interested
A chief concern behind the IRS's keen interest in what a company calls "compensation" is the possibility that what is being labeled compensation is in fact a constructive dividend. If employees with ownership interests are being paid excessive amounts by the company, the IRS may challenge compensation deductions on the grounds that what is being called deductible compensation is, in fact, a nondeductible dividend.
Another area of concern for the IRS is the payment of personal expenses of an employee that are disguised as businesses expenses. There, the business is trying to obtain a business expense deduction without the offsetting tax paid by the employee in recognizing income. In such cases, a business and its owners can end up with a triple loss after an IRS audit: taxable income to the individual, no deduction to the business and a tax penalty due from both parties.
Factors Examined
The factors most often examined by the IRS in deciding whether payments are reasonable compensation for services or are, instead, disguised dividend payments, include:
The salary history of the individual employee
Compensation paid by comparable employers to comparable employees
The salary history of other employees of the company
Special employee expertise or efforts
Year-end payments
Independent inactive investor analysis
Deferred compensation plan contributions
Independence of the board of directors
Viewpoint of a hypothetical investor contemplating purchase of the company as to whether such potential investor would be willing to pay the compensation.
Failure to pass the reasonable compensation test will result in the company's loss of all or part of its deduction. Analysis and examination of a company's compensation deductions in light of the relevant listed factors can provide the company with the assurance that the compensation it pays will be treated as reasonable -- and may in the process prevent the loss of its deductions.
Note: In the case of publicly held corporations, a separate $1 million dollar per person cap is also placed on deductible compensation paid to the CEO and each of the four other highest-paid officers identified for SEC purposes. (Certain types of compensation, including performance-based compensation approved by outside directors, are not included in the $1 million limitation.)
The S Corp Enigma
The opposite side of the reasonable compensation coin is present in the case of some S corporations. By characterizing compensation payments as dividends, the owners of these corporations seek to reduce employment taxes due on amounts paid to them by their companies. In these cases, the IRS attempts to recharacterize dividends as salary if the amounts were, in fact, paid to the shareholders for services rendered to the corporation.
Caution. In the course of performing the compensation-dividend analysis, watch out for contingent compensation arrangements and for compensation that is proportional to stock ownership. While not always indicators that payments are distributions of dividends instead of compensation for services, their presence does suggest the possibility. Compensation plans should not be keyed to ownership interests. Contingent and incentive arrangements are also scrutinized by the IRS. The courts have frequently ruled that a shareholder has a built-in interest in seeing that the company is successful and rewarding him for increasing the value of his own property is inappropriate. Similar to the reasonable compensation test, however, this rule is not hard and fast. Accordingly, the rules followed in each jurisdiction will control there.
Conclusions
Determining whether a shareholder-employee's compensation is reasonable depends upon many variables, such as the contributions that employee makes to your business, the compensation levels within your industry, and whether an independent investor in your company would accept the employee's compensation as reasonable.
Please call our office for a more customized analysis of how your particular compensation package fits into the various rules and guidelines. Further examination of your practices not only may help your business better sustain its compensation deductions; it may also help you take advantage of other compensation arrangements and opportunities.
